Segment
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 Upper-middle2. Toyo Snowprox S954 Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian WR SUV 3 vs. Toyo Snowprox S954
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Toyo). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (52%) than Toyo (49%). The first tyre test of Nokian WR SUV 3 was done in 2015, compared to 2017 when was the Toyo Snowprox S954 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2018 235/60 R18 test, where both the WR SUV 3 and the Snowprox S954 were tested.
| # | Nokian WR SUV 3
| Toyo Snowprox S954
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R21 | R16 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 4.25
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 Highly recommended2. Toyo Snowprox S954 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Toyo Snowprox S954 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow cornering
Snow handling
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 100%
Dry lane changing
Comfort
(Overall rating)Comfort
Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 406 | vítěz testu | 147 | 134 | 143 | ||
| Nokian WR SUV 3 Rating: Highly recommended | 390 | velmi doporučeno | 131 | 128 | 131 | ||
| Toyo Snowprox S954 Rating: - | 348 | (-) | 121 | 123 | 104 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
