Segment
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 Upper-middle2. Nokian WR SUV 4 Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian WR SUV 3 vs. Nokian WR SUV 4
Both of the tyres in this comparison are made by Nokian, which is a brand from Finland. The first tyre test of Nokian WR SUV 3 was done in 2015, compared to 2018 when was the Nokian WR SUV 4 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 80% of Nokian WR SUV 3 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (89%) of the Nokian WR SUV 4 also have C wet ratings.
| # | Nokian WR SUV 3
| Nokian WR SUV 4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 | | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R21 | R16 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 4.25
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 Highly recommended2. Nokian WR SUV 4 Test winner
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WR SUV 4 Good
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow handling
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 100%