Segment
1. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 SUV Premium2. Nokian WR SUV 3 Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian WR SUV 3 vs. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 SUV
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (90%) than Nokian (52%). The first tyre test of Nokian WR SUV 3 was done in 2015, compared to 2021 when was the Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 SUV first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 80% of Nokian WR SUV 3 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (71%) of the Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 SUV also have C wet ratings.
| # | Nokian WR SUV 3
| Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 SUV
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R21 | R17 - R23 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Nokian WR SUV 3 4.25
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 SUV Exemplary2. Nokian WR SUV 3 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 SUV Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow cornering
Snow handling
Lateral guidance on snow
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 100%
