• 12 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Nokian WR SUV 3 vs. Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (90%) than Nokian (52%). But when it comes to comparing Nokian WR SUV 3 and Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2018 235/60 R18 test, where both the WR SUV 3 and the Latitude Alpin LA2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 80% of Nokian WR SUV 3 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2 also have C wet ratings.

# Nokian WR SUV 3
/0%
Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2
/0%

Add to comparison

Nokian
Michelin
DimensionsR15 - R21 R16 - R21
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autozeitung
Name Points totalRatingWetDrySnow
Best values in test406vítěz testu147134143
Nokian WR SUV 3
Rating: Highly recommended
390velmi doporučeno131128131
Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2
Rating: Test winner
406 vítěz testu 143120143
Show test details
Autobild
Name RatingWetDrySnow
Best values in testPříkladné12+2+
Nokian WR SUV 3
Rating: -
Dostatečné223+
Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2
Rating: -
Dobré22-2+
Show test details
Offroad
Name WetDrySnowIce
Best values in test2+1-11-
Nokian WR SUV 32+ 1- 1 1-
Michelin Latitude Alpin LA232-23+
Show test details