Segment
1. Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2 Premium2. Nokian WR SUV 3 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (90%) than Nokian (52%). But when it comes to comparing Nokian WR SUV 3 and Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2018 235/60 R18 test, where both the WR SUV 3 and the Latitude Alpin LA2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 80% of Nokian WR SUV 3 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2 also have C wet ratings.
# | Nokian WR SUV 3
| Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R15 - R21 | R16 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2 Premium2. Nokian WR SUV 3 Upper-middle
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 4.25
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 Highly recommended2. Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2 Test winner
1. Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2 Satisfactory
Name | Points total | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 406 | vítěz testu | 147 | 134 | 143 | ||
Nokian WR SUV 3 Rating: Highly recommended | 390 | velmi doporučeno | 131 | 128 | 131 | ||
Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2 Rating: Test winner | 406 | vítěz testu | 143 | 120 | 143 | ||
Show test details |
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | Příkladné | 1 | 2+ | 2+ | |||
Nokian WR SUV 3 Rating: - | Dostatečné | 2 | 2 | 3+ | |||
Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2 Rating: - | Dobré | 2 | 2- | 2+ | |||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | 1- | |||
Nokian WR SUV 3 | 2+ | 1- | 1 | 1- | |||
Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2 | 3 | 2- | 2 | 3+ | |||
Show test details |