Segment
2. Nokian WR SUV 3 Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian WR SUV 3 vs. Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (78%) than Nokian (52%). The first tyre test of Nokian WR SUV 3 was done in 2015, compared to 2021 when was the Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 80% of Nokian WR SUV 3 has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A has B rating.
| # | Nokian WR SUV 3
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R21 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 4.25
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 Highly recommended2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow cornering
Snow handling
Lateral guidance on snow
Snow traction
Snow braking
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 100%
