Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo Premium2. Nokian WR SUV 3 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Nokian (52%). But when it comes to comparing Nokian WR SUV 3 and Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2018 235/60 R18 test, where both the WR SUV 3 and the Blizzak LM-80 Evo were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 80% of Nokian WR SUV 3 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo also have C wet ratings.
# | Nokian WR SUV 3
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R15 - R21 | R15 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo Premium2. Nokian WR SUV 3 Upper-middle
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 4.25
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 Highly recommended2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo Still recommended
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo Still recommended
Name | Points total | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 406 | vítěz testu | 147 | 134 | 143 | ||
Nokian WR SUV 3 Rating: Highly recommended | 390 | velmi doporučeno | 131 | 128 | 131 | ||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo Rating: - | 355 | (-) | 97 | 123 | 135 | ||
Show test details |
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | příkladné | 1- | 2 | 1- | |||
Nokian WR SUV 3 Rating: - | Uspokojivé | 2- | 2- | 2- | |||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo Rating: - | Podmíněně doporučeno | 3 | 3+ | 2+ | |||
Show test details |