Segment
1. Nokian WR Snowproof Upper-middle2. Nokian WR SUV 4 Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian WR Snowproof vs. Nokian WR SUV 4
Both of the tyres in this comparison are made by Nokian, which is a brand from Finland. In this particular case, the Nokian WR Snowproof has a better rating of 55% compared to 26% of the Nokian WR SUV 4. The first tyre test of Nokian WR Snowproof was done in 2019, compared to 2018 when was the Nokian WR SUV 4 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 86% of Nokian WR Snowproof has B wet grip rating, whereas 89% of Nokian WR SUV 4 has C rating. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the WR Snowproof is made in Finland/Russian Federation and WR SUV 4 is made in Russian Federation.
| # | Nokian WR Snowproof
| Nokian WR SUV 4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 | | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R16 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Nokian WR Snowproof 11.07
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR SUV 4 Test winner2. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WR SUV 4 Good2. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Dry driving behavior
Dry steering response
1. Nokian WR SUV 4 100%
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow handling
Snow cornering
Snow acceleration
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Nokian WR Snowproof 69 dB2. Nokian WR SUV 4 72 dB