Segment
1. Nokian WR Snowproof Upper-middle2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Nokian WR Snowproof vs. Fulda Kristall Control HP2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (52%) than Fulda (42%). In this particular case, the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 has a better rating of 59% compared to 55% of the Nokian WR Snowproof. The first tyre test of Nokian WR Snowproof was done in 2019, compared to 2017 when was the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 205/55 R16 test, where both the WR Snowproof and the Kristall Control HP2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 86% of Nokian WR Snowproof dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (63%) of the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 also have B wet ratings. We also know where WR Snowproof is made - Finland/Russian Federation.
| # | Nokian WR Snowproof
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R15 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Nokian WR Snowproof 11.07
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Exemplary2. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Satisfactory2. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow handling
Snow cornering
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Price/value
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Wear | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | 1 | |
| Nokian WR Snowproof Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3 | 2 | 2- | 1- | 2+ | |
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3+ | 3+ | 2- | 2 | 1 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 27,3 | |||||
| Nokian WR Snowproof | 36,5 | 29,2 | |||||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 | 36,8 | 28,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Noise |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 200 | velmi doporučeno | 67 | 48 | 60 | 18 | 9 |
| Nokian WR Snowproof Rating: Recommended | 179 | doporučeno | 56 | 45 | 47 | 18 | 7 |
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Recommended | 177 | doporučeno | 56 | 45 | 57 | 16 | 3 |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | ||
| Nokian WR Snowproof Rating: Good | dobré | 2- | 2- | 2+ | 2- | ||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Good | dobré | 2- | 2- | 2+ | 2- | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
| Nokian WR Snowproof | 32,2 | 24,6 | |||||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 | 33,5 | 24,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
