• 10 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Nokian WR Snowproof vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Nokian (52%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has a better rating of 87% compared to 55% of the Nokian WR Snowproof. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 225/45 R17 test, where both the WR Snowproof and the Blizzak LM-005 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 86% of Nokian WR Snowproof has B wet grip rating, whereas 98% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has A rating. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the WR Snowproof is made in Finland/Russian Federation and Blizzak LM-005 is made in Italy/Hungary/Poland.

# Nokian WR Snowproof
/55%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
/87%

Add to comparison

Nokian
Bridgestone
DimensionsR14 - R20 R14 - R22
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

ADAC
Name Enviromental impactDriving safety
Best values in test1,82,0
Nokian WR Snowproof
Rating: Satisfactory
2,43,2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Rating: Satisfactory
3,13,2
Show test details
Autoklub ČR
Name Points totalWetDrySnow
Best values in test103,6108,3100,2102,1
Nokian WR Snowproof100100100100
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005103,5108100,2 101,8
Show test details
ADAC
Name WetDrySnowIceRolling resistanceNoiseWear
Best values in test2,01,81,41,81,52,71,5
Nokian WR Snowproof
Rating: Satisfactory
3,22,72,42,32,02,7 2,0
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Rating: Satisfactory
2,0 1,8 2,72,42,13,42,5
Show test details
Autobild
Name WetDrySnowRolling resistanceWear
Best values in test2+2+11-1
Nokian WR Snowproof
Rating: Satisfactory
322-1- 2+
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Rating: Good
1-21 22+
Show test details
ADAC
Name WetDrySnowIceNoiseWear
Best values in test1,61,91,92,02,62,0
Nokian WR Snowproof
Rating: Satisfactory
3,32,52,32,22,92,5
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Rating: Satisfactory
1,72,52,82,33,33,0
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on wetStopping distance on snow
Best values in test32,127,3
Nokian WR Snowproof36,529,2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-00532,1 28,1
Show test details
Autoexpress
Name Points totalWinterWetDryRolling resistanceNoise
Best values in test101,6299,9299,9100101,1100,7
Nokian WR Snowproof97,2290,8278,996,410097,6
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005100285,8299,8100 87,699,8
Show test details
Autoklub ČR
Name Points totalWetDrySnow
Best values in test101,1103,4102,8100
Nokian WR Snowproof95,6390,3100,596,1
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005101,1 103,4 102,8 97
Show test details
ACE
Name Points totalWetDrySnowRolling resistanceNoise
Best values in test200674860189
Nokian WR Snowproof
Rating: Recommended
17956454718 7
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Rating: Highly recommended
200 644760 177
Show test details
AutoMotorSport
Name WetDrySnowRolling resistanceNoise
Best values in test9,58,79,9109
Nokian WR Snowproof
Rating: Good
6,48,16,310 7
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Rating: Very good
9,5 8,59,210 8
Show test details
ADAC
Name WetDrySnowIceNoiseWearFuel consumption
Best values in test1,51,91,82,32,60,81,8
Nokian WR Snowproof
Rating: Satisfactory
2,92,52,52,72,72,02,1
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Rating: Satisfactory
1,5 3,02,22,43,02,01,8
Show test details
Autobild
Name WetDrySnowRunning costs
Best values in test2+2+11-
Nokian WR Snowproof
Rating: Good
2-2-2+2-
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Rating: Exemplary
1-222
Show test details
Automotorsport
Name Points total
Best values in test8,9
Nokian WR Snowproof
Rating: Satisfactory
6,2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Rating: Very good
8,8
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on wetStopping distance on snow
Best values in test29,224
Nokian WR Snowproof32,224,6
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-00529,2 24,6
Show test details