Segment
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P Upper-middle2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian WR Snowproof P vs. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (52%) than Yokohama (46%). The first tyre test of Nokian WR Snowproof P was done in 2021, compared to 2018 when was the Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian WR Snowproof P has B wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 has C rating.
| # | Nokian WR Snowproof P
| Yokohama BluEarth winter V905
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R21 | R15 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory2. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory2. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
Snow cornering
Snow handling
Snow traction
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
Dry braking
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Comfort
Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P 70 dB
