Segment
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P Upper-middle2. Nokian WR SUV 4 Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian WR Snowproof P vs. Nokian WR SUV 4
Both of the tyres in this comparison are made by Nokian, which is a brand from Finland. In this particular case, the Nokian WR Snowproof P has a better rating of 44% compared to 26% of the Nokian WR SUV 4. The first tyre test of Nokian WR Snowproof P was done in 2021, compared to 2018 when was the Nokian WR SUV 4 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian WR Snowproof P has B wet grip rating, whereas 89% of Nokian WR SUV 4 has C rating.
| # | Nokian WR Snowproof P
| Nokian WR SUV 4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 | | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R21 | R16 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR SUV 4 Test winner2. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WR SUV 4 Good2. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory
Snow
(Overall rating)Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P 70 dB