Segment
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P Upper-middle2. Kormoran SNOW Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Kormoran). Kormoran is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (52%) than Kormoran (14%). In this particular case, the Nokian WR Snowproof P has a better rating of 44% compared to 6% of the Kormoran SNOW. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the WR Snowproof P and the SNOW were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian WR Snowproof P has B wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Kormoran SNOW has C rating.
# | Nokian WR Snowproof P
| Kormoran SNOW
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R17 - R21 | R15 - R18 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P Upper-middle2. Kormoran SNOW Lowcost
2. Kormoran SNOW 16.
2. Kormoran SNOW 38.
2. Kormoran SNOW 30.33
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory
1. Kormoran SNOW 100%
1. Kormoran SNOW 95%
2. Kormoran SNOW 67%
1. Kormoran SNOW 68%
1. Kormoran SNOW 55%
2. Kormoran SNOW 73%
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P 70 dB
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,8 | 25,4 | |||||
Nokian WR Snowproof P | 36 | 26,2 | |||||
Kormoran Snow | 38,4 | ||||||
Show test details |