Segment
1. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle2. Matador MP93 Nordicca Lowcost
Comparison: Nokian WR D4 vs. Matador MP93 Nordicca
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovakia (Matador). Matador is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (52%) than Matador (38%). The first tyre test of Nokian WR D4 was done in 2015, compared to 2022 when was the Matador MP93 Nordicca first tested. We also know where WR D4 is made - Finland.
| # | Nokian WR D4
| Matador MP93 Nordicca
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R20 | R13 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
1. Nokian WR D4 14.
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WR D4 6.04
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR D4 Highly recommended2. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WR D4 Recommended2. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
1. Nokian WR D4 81%
Dry driving behavior
1. Nokian WR D4 72%
Dry handling
1. Nokian WR D4 78%
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
1. Nokian WR D4 73%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
1. Nokian WR D4 76%
Wet braking
2. Nokian WR D4 70%
Wet handling
1. Nokian WR D4 69%
Wet circle cornering
1. Nokian WR D4 72%
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
1. Nokian WR D4 89%
Snow braking
1. Nokian WR D4 91%
Snow handling
1. Nokian WR D4 91%
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
1. Nokian WR D4 69%
Interior noise
1. Nokian WR D4 69%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel efficiency
1. Nokian WR D4 86%
Mileage
1. Nokian WR D4 67%
Rolling resistance
1. Nokian WR D4 99%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Ice braking
2. Nokian WR D4 85%
Ice lateral guidance
1. Nokian WR D4 82%
