Segment
1. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Lowcost
Comparison: Nokian WR D4 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovakia (Matador). Matador is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (52%) than Matador (38%). But when it comes to comparing Nokian WR D4 and Matador MP92 Sibir Snow, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 195/65 R15 test, where both the WR D4 and the MP92 Sibir Snow were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 97% of Nokian WR D4 has B wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Matador MP92 Sibir Snow has C rating. We also know where WR D4 is made - Finland.
| # | Nokian WR D4
| Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R20 | R15 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
1. Nokian WR D4 14.
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WR D4 6.04
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR D4 Highly recommended2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WR D4 Recommended2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
1. Nokian WR D4 85%
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
2. Nokian WR D4 76%
Wet handling
2. Nokian WR D4 70%
Aquaplaning - cross
1. Nokian WR D4 72%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
1. Nokian WR D4 72%
Wet circle cornering
1. Nokian WR D4 76%
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
1. Nokian WR D4 88%
Snow braking
1. Nokian WR D4 86%
Snow handling
1. Nokian WR D4 91%
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
2. Nokian WR D4 78%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
1. Nokian WR D4 79%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1 | 1 | |||
| Nokian WR D4 Rating: Satisfactory | 3 | 2- | 1 | 2 | |||
| Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2- | 2- | 2- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,3 | 27 | |||||
| Nokian WR D4 | 37,3 | 27,6 | |||||
| Matador MP92 Sibir Snow | 36,6 | 28,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,2 | 25,9 | |||||
| Nokian WR D4 | 35 | 27,7 | |||||
| Matador MP92 Sibir Snow | 38,4 | - | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Nokian WR D4 | 37,3 | 26,0 | |||||
| Matador MP92 Sibir Snow | 40,6 | 26,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,3 | 2,1 | 1,7 | 2,0 | 2,8 | 1,5 | 1,5 |
| Nokian WR D4 Rating: - | 2,6 | 2,4 | 2,2 | 2,1 | 3,1 | 3,0 | 2,0 |
| Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Rating: - | 3,7 | 2,6 | 2,2 | 2,5 | 3,2 | 2,0 | 1,9 |
| Show test details | |||||||
