Segment
1. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Nokian WR D4 vs. Fulda Kristall Control HP2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (52%) than Fulda (42%). The first tyre test of Nokian WR D4 was done in 2015, compared to 2017 when was the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 195/65 R15 test, where both the WR D4 and the Kristall Control HP2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 97% of Nokian WR D4 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (63%) of the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 also have B wet ratings. We also know where WR D4 is made - Finland.
| # | Nokian WR D4
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R20 | R15 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
1. Nokian WR D4 14.
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WR D4 6.04
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Exemplary2. Nokian WR D4 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WR D4 Recommended2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Satisfactory
Dry
(Overall rating)Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 1- | 2+ | 1 | 1 | ||
| Nokian WR D4 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3 | 2- | 1 | 2 | ||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Exemplary | příkladné | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 2,1 | 2,0 | 1,8 | 2,3 | 3,0 | 1,0 | 1,7 |
| Nokian WR D4 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,9 | 2,5 | 1,8 | 2,5 | 3,4 | 3,0 | 1,7 |
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,7 | 2,5 | 2,8 | 2,3 | 3,6 | 2,0 | 2,1 |
| Show test details | ||||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,3 | 27 | |||||
| Nokian WR D4 | 37,3 | 27,6 | |||||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 | 34,8 | 27,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 1- | ||
| Nokian WR D4 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2 | 2- | 2 | 3+ | ||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Good | dobré | 2 | 2 | 2+ | 1- | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,2 | 25,9 | |||||
| Nokian WR D4 | 35 | 27,7 | |||||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 | 35,5 | 28,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 2,1 | 2,0 | 1,9 | 2,3 | 3,1 | 0,5 | 1,4 |
| Nokian WR D4 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,6 | 2,5 | 1,9 | 2,5 | 3,4 | 2,5 | 2,0 |
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,5 | 2,4 | 2,9 | 2,5 | 3,3 | 1,5 | 1,6 |
| Show test details | ||||||||