Segment
1. Nokian WR D3 Upper-middle2. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian WR D3 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP51
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (52%) than Kumho (38%). Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2015 185/60 R15 test, where both the WR D3 and the WinterCraft WP51 were tested.
| # | Nokian WR D3
| Kumho WinterCraft WP51
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R17 | R13 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
2. Nokian WR D3 10.
Worst position in test
1. Nokian WR D3 17.
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WR D3 13.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Sufficient
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36,8 | 27,7 | |||||
| Nokian WR D3 | 42,7 | 28,2 | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP51 | 42,5 | 30,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||