Segment
1. Nokian WR D3 Upper-middle2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian WR D3 vs. Firestone Winterhawk 3
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone). Generally, Firestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (65%) than Nokian (52%). But when it comes to comparing Nokian WR D3 and Firestone Winterhawk 3, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2015 185/60 R15 test, where both the WR D3 and the Winterhawk 3 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 56% of Nokian WR D3 has B wet grip rating, whereas 92% of Firestone Winterhawk 3 has C rating.
| # | Nokian WR D3
| Firestone Winterhawk 3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R17 | R13 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
2. Nokian WR D3 10.
Worst position in test
1. Nokian WR D3 17.
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WR D3 13.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36,8 | 27,7 | |||||
| Nokian WR D3 | 42,7 | 28,2 | |||||
| Firestone Winterhawk 3 | 41,9 | 28,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 1 | 2+ | 1 | 1 | ||
| Nokian WR D3 Rating: - | Doporučitelné | 2- | 2 | 2+ | 2+ | ||
| Firestone Winterhawk 3 Rating: - | Doporučitelné | 2- | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
