Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium2. Nokian WR D3 Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian WR D3 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Nokian (52%). But when it comes to comparing Nokian WR D3 and Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2015 185/60 R15 test, where both the WR D3 and the Blizzak LM-001 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 56% of Nokian WR D3 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (71%) of the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 also have B wet ratings.
| # | Nokian WR D3
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R17 | R14 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
2. Nokian WR D3 10.
Worst position in test
1. Nokian WR D3 17.
Average position in tests
2. Nokian WR D3 13.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36,8 | 27,7 | |||||
| Nokian WR D3 | 42,7 | 28,2 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | 43,4 | 28,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1 | 1 | |||
| Nokian WR D3 Rating: - | 2- | 2 | 2+ | 2+ | |||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: - | 2- | 2- | 2+ | 1- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
