Segment
1. Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter Premium2. Nokian WR C3 Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian WR C3 vs. Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Generally, Vredestein winter tyres are slightly better rated (71%) than Nokian (52%). But when it comes to comparing Nokian WR C3 and Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ProMobil 2018 225/70 R15 test, where both the WR C3 and the Comtrac 2 Winter were tested.
| # | Nokian WR C3
| Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R15 - R16 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR C3 Conditionally recommended2. Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter Still recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WR C3 Conditionally recommended2. Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter Still recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | doporučeno | ||||||
| Nokian WR C3 Rating: Conditionally recommended | podmíněně doporučeno | ||||||
| Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter Rating: Still recommended | ještě doporučeno | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||