Segment
1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Premium2. Nokian WR C3 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (90%) than Nokian (52%). But when it comes to comparing Nokian WR C3 and Michelin AGILIS ALPIN, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ProMobil 2018 225/70 R15 test, where both the WR C3 and the AGILIS ALPIN were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 91% of Nokian WR C3 has E wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Michelin AGILIS ALPIN has B rating.
# | Nokian WR C3
| Michelin AGILIS ALPIN
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R15 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Premium2. Nokian WR C3 Upper-middle
1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Recommended2. Nokian WR C3 Conditionally recommended
1. Nokian WR C3 Conditionally recommended2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Still recommended
2. Nokian WR C3 33%
2. Nokian WR C3 33%
2. Nokian WR C3 25%
2. Nokian WR C3 25%
2. Nokian WR C3 33%
1. Nokian WR C3 62%
1. Nokian WR C3 100%
1. Nokian WR C3 100%
1. Nokian WR C3 100%
1. Nokian WR C3 81%
2. Nokian WR C3 50%
Name | Rating | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | doporučeno | ||||||
Nokian WR C3 Rating: Conditionally recommended | podmíněně doporučeno | ||||||
Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Rating: Still recommended | ještě doporučeno | ||||||
Show test details |