Segment
1. Continental VanContact Winter Premium2. Nokian WR C3 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (77%) than Nokian (52%). But when it comes to comparing Nokian WR C3 and Continental VanContact Winter, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ProMobil 2018 225/70 R15 test, where both the WR C3 and the VanContact Winter were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 91% of Nokian WR C3 has E wet grip rating, whereas 98% of Continental VanContact Winter has B rating.
# | Nokian WR C3
| Continental VanContact Winter
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
Price | Not available in 185/60 R15 (change) | Not available in 185/60 R15 (change) | |
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Continental VanContact Winter Premium2. Nokian WR C3 Upper-middle
1. Continental VanContact Winter Recommended2. Nokian WR C3 Conditionally recommended
1. Continental VanContact Winter Recommended2. Nokian WR C3 Conditionally recommended
2. Nokian WR C3 25%
2. Nokian WR C3 25%
2. Nokian WR C3 33%
2. Nokian WR C3 33%
2. Nokian WR C3 33%
2. Nokian WR C3 62%
1. Nokian WR C3 100%
1. Nokian WR C3 100%
1. Nokian WR C3 100%
1. Nokian WR C3 81%
2. Nokian WR C3 50%
Name | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nokian WR C3 Rating: Conditionally recommended | |||||||
Continental VanContact Winter Rating: Recommended | |||||||
Show test details |