Segment
1. Nokian WR A4 Upper-middle2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian WR A4 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Uniroyal). Uniroyal is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Uniroyal winter tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Nokian (52%). The first tyre test of Nokian WR A4 was done in 2017, compared to 2015 when was the Uniroyal MS plus 77 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 245/45 R18 test, where both the WR A4 and the MS plus 77 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Nokian WR A4
| Uniroyal MS plus 77
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R13 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
2. Nokian WR A4 17.
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WR A4 9.832. Uniroyal MS plus 77 11.21
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory2. Nokian WR A4 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory2. Nokian WR A4 Still recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
2. Nokian WR A4 60%
Wet braking
2. Nokian WR A4 56%
Wet circle cornering
2. Nokian WR A4 65%
Wet handling
2. Nokian WR A4 64%
Aquaplaning - cross
2. Nokian WR A4 58%
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
2. Nokian WR A4 79%
Snow braking
2. Nokian WR A4 77%
Snow cornering
2. Nokian WR A4 68%
Snow handling
2. Nokian WR A4 73%
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
1. Nokian WR A4 88%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Comfort
2. Nokian WR A4 67%
Exterior noise
2. Nokian WR A4 80%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
1. Nokian WR A4 77%
Dry handling
2. Nokian WR A4 75%
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 2+ | 1- | 2+ | 1- | ||
| Nokian WR A4 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2- | 2 | 2- | 2 | ||
| Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Good | dobré | 2- | 2 | 2+ | 3+ | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 30,3 | 24,3 | |||||
| Nokian WR A4 | 34,6 | 25,5 | |||||
| Uniroyal MS plus 77 | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 1- | 2 | 1- | |||
| Nokian WR A4 Rating: Not recommended | nedoporučeno | 4+ | 2- | 2 | |||
| Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Good | dobré | 2- | 2 | 1- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
