Segment
1. Nokian WR A4 Upper-middle2. Toyo Snowprox S954 Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian WR A4 vs. Toyo Snowprox S954
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Toyo). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (52%) than Toyo (49%). Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 245/45 R18 test, where both the WR A4 and the Snowprox S954 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Nokian WR A4
| Toyo Snowprox S954
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R16 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
1. Nokian WR A4 17.
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WR A4 9.83
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Toyo Snowprox S954 Satisfactory2. Nokian WR A4 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Toyo Snowprox S954 Conditionally recommended2. Nokian WR A4 Still recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 30,3 | 24,3 | |||||
| Nokian WR A4 | 34,6 | 25,5 | |||||
| Toyo Snowprox S954 | 37 | 26,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 1- | 2 | 1- | |||
| Nokian WR A4 Rating: Not recommended | nedoporučeno | 4+ | 2- | 2 | |||
| Toyo Snowprox S954 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2 | 2 | 3+ | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
