Segment
1. Nokian WR A4 Upper-middle2. Nokian WR SUV 4 Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian WR A4 vs. Nokian WR SUV 4
Table of contents:
Both of the tyres in this comparison are made by Nokian, which is a brand from Finland. The first tyre test of Nokian WR A4 was done in 2017, compared to 2018 when was the Nokian WR SUV 4 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 94% of Nokian WR A4 has B wet grip rating, whereas 89% of Nokian WR SUV 4 has C rating.
| # | Nokian WR A4
| Nokian WR SUV 4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 | | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R16 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
2. Nokian WR A4 17.
Average position in tests
2. Nokian WR A4 9.83
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR SUV 4 Test winner2. Nokian WR A4 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WR SUV 4 Good2. Nokian WR A4 Still recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
2. Nokian WR A4 63%
Wet circle cornering
2. Nokian WR A4 71%
Wet handling
2. Nokian WR A4 65%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
1. Nokian WR A4 64%
Aquaplaning - cross
1. Nokian WR A4 58%
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
2. Nokian WR A4 78%
Snow cornering
2. Nokian WR A4 72%
Snow handling
2. Nokian WR A4 73%
Snow traction
2. Nokian WR A4 79%
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
1. Nokian WR A4 89%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Comfort
1. Nokian WR A4 72%
Exterior noise
1. Nokian WR A4 83%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
2. Nokian WR A4 81%
Dry handling
2. Nokian WR A4 78%
