Segment
1. Nokian WR A4 Upper-middle2. Nokian WR Snowproof Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian WR A4 vs. Nokian WR Snowproof
Table of contents:
Both of the tyres in this comparison are made by Nokian, which is a brand from Finland. The first tyre test of Nokian WR A4 was done in 2017, compared to 2019 when was the Nokian WR Snowproof first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 94% of Nokian WR A4 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (86%) of the Nokian WR Snowproof also have B wet ratings.
| # | Nokian WR A4
| Nokian WR Snowproof
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 | | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
1. Nokian WR A4 17.
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WR A4 9.832. Nokian WR Snowproof 11.07
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory2. Nokian WR A4 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory2. Nokian WR A4 Still recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
2. Nokian WR A4 65%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
2. Nokian WR A4 64%
Wet braking
2. Nokian WR A4 63%
Wet circle cornering
2. Nokian WR A4 71%
Aquaplaning - cross
2. Nokian WR A4 58%
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow cornering
1. Nokian WR A4 72%
Snow handling
2. Nokian WR A4 73%
Snow traction
1. Nokian WR A4 79%
Snow braking
2. Nokian WR A4 78%
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
2. Nokian WR A4 89%
Mileage
2. Nokian WR A4 64%
Price/value
1. Nokian WR A4 71%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
2. Nokian WR A4 83%
Comfort
2. Nokian WR A4 72%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
2. Nokian WR A4 81%
Dry handling
2. Nokian WR A4 78%
