• 14 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Nokian WR A4 vs. Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (90%) than Nokian (52%). But when it comes to comparing Nokian WR A4 and Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Nokian WR A4 was done in 2017, compared to 2015 when was the Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 255/35 R19 test, where both the WR A4 and the Pilot Alpin PA4 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 94% of Nokian WR A4 has B wet grip rating, whereas 91% of Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 has C rating.

# Nokian WR A4
/0%
Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4
/0%

Add to comparison

Nokian
Michelin
DimensionsR16 - R21 R17 - R21
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autobild
Name RatingWetDrySnow
Best values in testpříkladné1-21-
Nokian WR A4
Rating: Not recommended
nedoporučeno4+2-2
Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4
Rating: Good
dobré22 2
Show test details
Sportscars
Name RatingWetDrySnow
Best values in testpříkladné1-2+1-
Nokian WR A4
Rating: Satisfactory
uspokojivé3+22-
Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4
Rating: Exemplary
příkladné 2+21-
Show test details
AutoMotorSport
Name RatingWetDrySnowEnviromental impact
Best values in testvítěz testu - velmi doporučeno9,69,29,910
Nokian WR A4
Rating: Still recommended
ještě doporučeno6,39,2 7,110
Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4
Rating: Recommended
doporučeno7,78,18,47,2
Show test details