Segment
1. Michelin e.Primacy Premium2. Nokian WetProof Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (79%) than Nokian (66%). In this particular case, the Michelin e.Primacy has a better rating of 71% compared to 68% of the Nokian WetProof. The first tyre test of Nokian WetProof was done in 2019, compared to 2023 when was the Michelin e.Primacy first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 205/55 R16 test, where both the WetProof and the e.Primacy were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian WetProof has A wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Michelin e.Primacy has B rating. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the WetProof is made in Finland and e.Primacy is made in Italy/Spain/Germany.
# | Nokian WetProof
| Michelin e.Primacy
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R15 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin e.Primacy Premium2. Nokian WetProof Upper-middle
1. Nokian WetProof 5.64
1. Nokian WetProof Highly recommended2. Michelin e.Primacy Very good
1. Nokian WetProof Recommended2. Michelin e.Primacy Sufficient
Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
Nokian Wetproof Rating: Good | 2,9 | 2,0 | |||||
Michelin e.Primacy Rating: Sufficient | 1,3 | 3,9 | |||||
Show test details |