Segment
1. Nokian WetProof Upper-middle2. Cooper Zeon CS8 Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian WetProof vs. Cooper Zeon CS8
Table of contents:
| # | Nokian WetProof
| Cooper Zeon CS8
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R15 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
The Nokian WetProof and Cooper Zeon CS8 are both summer tyres offering distinct experiences and performances in various tyre tests. Both tyres have not been replaced by newer models yet.
The Nokian WetProof, with an impressive rating of 83% by our team, is a product of Finland and has shown a commendable performance in different tests. In the ADAC test, it was ranked 5th out of 50 tyres, underlining its superior performance to the majority of its competitors. Similarly, it secured a 5th rank in the Autobild test out of 53 tyres clearly showing its consistent top-tier performance. Its best features as noted in the Autobild test include 'Exterior noise' and 'Wet circle cornering.' The tyre's praise also extends to its efficiency and good performance on dry and wet surfaces. However, it faces criticism due to its environmental performance and minor weaknesses in durability and wear.
On the contrary, the Cooper Zeon CS8 made in Great Britain was met with a lesser enthusiastic response, with our team giving it a rating of just 56%. In comparative tests, the Zeon CS8 managed to secure the 33rd place in the ADAC test out of 50 tyres and the 29th spot in the Autobild test out of 53 tyres. The tyre was noted for performing decently on wet surfaces yet suffered from deficiencies on dry roads and in terms of environmental performance. Furthermore, it was criticised for its lack of durability, wear, efficiency, and sustainability.
In conclusion, the Nokian WetProof appears to be a better choice overall considering its superior performance in comparison tests and its significant strengths in areas such as noise, wet cornering, and efficiency. Conversely, the Cooper Zeon CS8, while decent on wet surfaces, falls short in many areas such as dry performance, environmental impact, and durability.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WetProof 5.642. Cooper Zeon CS8 19.71
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WetProof Highly recommended2. Cooper Zeon CS8 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WetProof Recommended2. Cooper Zeon CS8 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Cooper Zeon CS8 70 dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 1,3 | 1,8 | ||||
| Nokian Wetproof Rating: Good | dobré | 2,9 | 2,0 | ||||
| Cooper Zeon CS8 Rating: Sufficient | dostatečné | 3,3 | 3,6 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Nokian Wetproof | 35,1 | 31,7 | |||||
| Cooper Zeon CS8 | 38,0 | 34,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
| Nokian WetProof | 35,2 | 29,7 | |||||
| Cooper Zeon CS8 | 37,3 | 34,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
