Segment
1. Nokian Wetproof SUV Upper-middle2. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian Wetproof SUV vs. Firestone Roadhawk
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone). Generally, Firestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Nokian (66%). In this particular case, the Firestone Roadhawk has a better rating of 59% compared to 51% of the Nokian Wetproof SUV. The first tyre test of Nokian Wetproof SUV was done in 2021, compared to 2018 when was the Firestone Roadhawk first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian Wetproof SUV dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (99%) of the Firestone Roadhawk also have A wet ratings.
| # | Nokian Wetproof SUV
| Firestone Roadhawk
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R19 | R15 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Firestone Roadhawk Exemplary
Worst rating in test
2. Firestone Roadhawk Conditionally recommended