Segment
1. Nokian Wetproof SUV Upper-middle2. Falken Azenis FK510 SUV Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Nokian (66%). In this particular case, the Falken Azenis FK510 SUV has a better rating of 67% compared to 51% of the Nokian Wetproof SUV. The first tyre test of Nokian Wetproof SUV was done in 2021, compared to 2020 when was the Falken Azenis FK510 SUV first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Promobil 2022 235/55 R17 test, where both the Wetproof SUV and the Azenis FK510 SUV were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian Wetproof SUV dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (57%) of the Falken Azenis FK510 SUV also have A wet ratings.
# | Nokian Wetproof SUV
| Falken Azenis FK510 SUV
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R16 - R19 | R17 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Nokian Wetproof SUV Upper-middle2. Falken Azenis FK510 SUV Upper-middle
1. Falken Azenis FK510 SUV Very good -
2. Falken Azenis FK510 SUV Recommended
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | velmi doporučeno | 7,3 | 7,7 | 5,9 | |||
Nokian WetProof SUV Rating: Recommended | doporučeno | 8,0 | 7,9 | 7,3 | |||
Falken Azenis FK510 SUV Rating: Recommended | doporučeno | 8,6 | 8,8 | 7,6 | |||
Show test details |