• 10 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Nokian Wetproof SUV vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (53%) than Bridgestone (52%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Turanza T005 has a better rating of 86% compared to 51% of the Nokian Wetproof SUV. The first tyre test of Nokian Wetproof SUV was done in 2021, compared to 2018 when was the Bridgestone Turanza T005 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Promobil 2022 235/55 R17 test, where both the Wetproof SUV and the Turanza T005 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian Wetproof SUV dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (82%) of the Bridgestone Turanza T005 also have A wet ratings.

# Nokian Wetproof SUV
/51%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
/86%

Add to comparison

Nokian
Bridgestone
DimensionsR16 - R19 R14 - R22
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Name WetDryEnviromental impact
Best values in test7,37,75,9
Nokian WetProof SUV
Rating: Recommended
8,07,97,3
Bridgestone Turanza T005
Rating: Recommended
8,48,58,8
Show test details
Name WetDryOffroad
Best values in test2+2+2+
Nokian WetProof SUV
Rating: Good
22-2+
Bridgestone Turanza T005
Rating: Exemplary
22+ 2
Show test details