Segment
1. Nokian WeatherProof Upper-middle2. Kumho Solus HA31 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho allround tyres are slightly better rated (71%) than Nokian (61%). But when it comes to comparing Nokian WeatherProof and Kumho Solus HA31, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Nokian WeatherProof was done in 2015, compared to 2016 when was the Kumho Solus HA31 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/45 R17 test, where both the WeatherProof and the Solus HA31 were tested. See more mutual tests below. We also know where WeatherProof is made - Finland.
# | Nokian WeatherProof
| Kumho Solus HA31
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R13 - R19 | R13 - R18 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Nokian WeatherProof Upper-middle2. Kumho Solus HA31 Upper-middle
2. Kumho Solus HA31 8.33
1. Nokian WeatherProof Good +2. Kumho Solus HA31 Satisfactory
1. Kumho Solus HA31 Satisfactory2. Nokian WeatherProof Sufficient
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 39,5 | 46,3 | |||||
Nokian WeatherProof | 44,5 | 51,3 | |||||
Kumho Solus HA31 | 43,8 | 49,5 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Points total | Winter | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 203 | 14 | 37 | 39 | 28 | ||
Nokian WeatherProof | 203 | 67 | 62 | 42 | 32 | ||
Kumho Solus HA31 | 160 | 50 | 37 | 42 | 31 | ||
Show test details |