Segment
1. Nokian WeatherProof Upper-middle2. Fulda MultiControl Lowcost
# | Nokian WeatherProof
| Fulda MultiControl
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R13 - R19 | R13 - R18 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Today, we're putting two high performance, all-round tyres under the spotlight - the Nokian WeatherProof, manufactured in Finland, and the Fulda MultiControl. Each tyre has had an opportunity to prove its mettle in various tests and we are here to provide a detailed comparison of the two based on the results gathered.
Beginning with the Nokian WeatherProof, this tyre snagged the 9th position out of 27 in the Autobild test, with its best features being Aquaplaning - cross, Rolling resistance, Snow handling, Snow braking and Snow traction. As a product of Nokian Tyres, known for their leading-edge technological innovations, these results are not surprising. Further, in the ACE test, the Nokian WeatherProof picked up the 4th spot out of 8, impressing testers with its Aquaplaning - both cross and longitudinal - and Dry handling.
Segueing to the Fulda MultiControl, this tyre managed 13th place in the Autobild test. However, it narrowed the gap in the ACE test by securing the 2nd position out of eight tyres, outperforming in Dry handling, Snow braking, and Snow traction. As part of the Fulda, a company renowned for its commitment to providing quality tyres, the MultiControl is a worthy contender indeed.
Although there are no previous models or newer models of both tyres that could be compared, these tests have given us significant data to deep dive into their strengths and weaknesses. When it comes to Aquaplaning and Snow handling, the Nokian WeatherProof shows superior efficacy. However, the Fulda MultiControl shines in Dry handling and Snow traction.
In summary, it's evident that both tyres offer unique strengths. The Nokian WeatherProof, from the house of Nokian Tyres, shows excellent aquaplaning resistance and snow handling, making it ideal for harsh weather conditions and snowy roads. On the other hand, the Fulda MultiControl, manufactured by Fulda, stands out in dry handling and snow traction. This makes it a versatile choice for various road conditions, and particularly adept at snowy conditions.
In conclusion, the choice between the two would depend on the specific requirements of the driver and the prevalent weather and road conditions. The comprehensive test data can serve as a guide to make an informed choice between these two high-performance, all-round tyres.
1. Nokian WeatherProof Upper-middle2. Fulda MultiControl Lowcost
2. Fulda MultiControl 22.71
1. Nokian WeatherProof Good +2. Fulda MultiControl Recommended
1. Fulda MultiControl Recommended2. Nokian WeatherProof Sufficient
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 39,7 | 45 | |||||
Nokian WeatherProof | 45,2 | 51,6 | |||||
Fulda MultiControl | 44,5 | 54,8 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Points total | Rating | Winter | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 200 | velmi doporučeno | 66 | 66 | 49 | 18 | 8 |
Nokian WeatherProof Rating: Recommended | 190 | doporučeno | 59 | 59 | 43 | 16 | 6 |
Fulda MultiControl Rating: Recommended | 193 | doporučeno | 66 | 55 | 43 | 16 | 6 |
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 39,5 | 46,3 | |||||
Nokian WeatherProof | 44,5 | 51,3 | |||||
Fulda MultiControl | 45,7 | 57 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 39,4 | 45,2 | |||||
Nokian WeatherProof | 44,2 | 50,7 | |||||
Fulda MultiControl | 45,3 | 52,3 | |||||
Show test details |