Segment
1. Michelin CrossClimate SUV Premium2. Nokian Weatherproof SUV Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin allround tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than Nokian (61%). The first tyre test of Nokian Weatherproof SUV was done in 2016, compared to 2018 when was the Michelin CrossClimate SUV first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 235/60 R18 test, where both the Weatherproof SUV and the CrossClimate SUV were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 67% of Nokian Weatherproof SUV has A wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Michelin CrossClimate SUV has B rating.
# | Nokian Weatherproof SUV
| Michelin CrossClimate SUV
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R16 - R19 | R16 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin CrossClimate SUV Premium2. Nokian Weatherproof SUV Upper-middle
1. Michelin CrossClimate SUV Exemplary
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | příkladné | 1- | 2+ | 2 | |||
Nokian Weatherproof SUV Rating: Good | dobré | 2+ | 2- | 2 | |||
Michelin CrossClimate SUV Rating: Good | dobré | 2+ | 2+ | 2- | |||
Show test details |