Segment
2. Nokian Weatherproof SUV Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian Weatherproof SUV vs. Goodyear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Goodyear). Generally, Goodyear allround tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than Nokian (61%). But when it comes to comparing Nokian Weatherproof SUV and Goodyear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-2, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Nokian Weatherproof SUV was done in 2016, compared to 2018 when was the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 235/60 R18 test, where both the Weatherproof SUV and the Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-2 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 67% of Nokian Weatherproof SUV has A wet grip rating, whereas 88% of Goodyear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-2 has B rating.
| # | Nokian Weatherproof SUV
| Goodyear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R19 | R16 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Goodyear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-2 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
Snow
(Overall rating)Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 1- | 2+ | 2 | |||
| Nokian Weatherproof SUV Rating: Good | dobré | 2+ | 2- | 2 | |||
| Goodyear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-2 Rating: Exemplary | příkladné | 1- | 2 | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
