Segment
1. Continental AllSeasonContact Premium2. Nokian Weatherproof SUV Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian Weatherproof SUV vs. Continental AllSeasonContact
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental allround tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Nokian (61%). The first tyre test of Nokian Weatherproof SUV was done in 2016, compared to 2018 when was the Continental AllSeasonContact first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 67% of Nokian Weatherproof SUV has A wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Continental AllSeasonContact has B rating.
| # | Nokian Weatherproof SUV
| Continental AllSeasonContact
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R19 | R13 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental AllSeasonContact Exemplary
Worst rating in test
2. Continental AllSeasonContact Sufficient
