Segment
1. Nokian Snowproof 2 Upper-middle2. Zeetex WH 1000 Lowcost
Comparison: Nokian Snowproof 2 vs. Zeetex WH 1000
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Zeetex). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (52%) than Zeetex (1%). The first tyre test of Nokian Snowproof 2 was done in 2023, compared to 2020 when was the Zeetex WH 1000 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the Snowproof 2 and the WH 1000 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Nokian Snowproof 2
| Zeetex WH 1000
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R19 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian Snowproof 2 Recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian Snowproof 2 Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Winter | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 1.6 | 1.9 | 2.0 | 2.3 | 2.9 | 1.7 | 2.0 |
| Nokian Snowproof 2 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2.1 | 2.4 | 2.7 | 3.0 | 3.1 | 2.2 | 2.7 |
| Zeetex WH 1000 Rating: Sufficient | dostatečné | 3.4 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 3.2 | 3.1 | 3.5 |
| Show test details | ||||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
| Nokian Snowproof 2 | 40.0 | 30.5 | |||||
| Zeetex WH 1000 | 42.3 | - | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
