Segment
2. Nokian Seasonproof SUV Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian Seasonproof SUV vs. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear). Generally, GoodYear allround tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than Nokian (61%). In this particular case, the GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 has a better rating of 88% compared to 56% of the Nokian Seasonproof SUV. The first tyre test of Nokian Seasonproof SUV was done in 2022, compared to 2021 when was the GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Gute-Fahrt 2022 235/55 R18 test, where both the Seasonproof SUV and the Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian Seasonproof SUV dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 also have B wet ratings.
| # | Nokian Seasonproof SUV
| GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R19 | R19 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 Very good2. Nokian Seasonproof SUV Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Nokian Seasonproof SUV Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nokian Seasonproof SUV Rating: Satisfactory | |||||||
| GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 Rating: Very good | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
