Segment
1. Nokian Powerproof Upper-middle2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Lowcost
# | Nokian Powerproof
| Sava Intensa UHP 2
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R17 - R20 | R17 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
When it comes to summer tyres, two stand-out options are the Nokian Powerproof and the Sava Intensa UHP 2. The Finnish-made Nokian model boasts an impressive rating of 71% on our website, while the newer version of Sava tyre comes with a slightly higher rating of 73%.
Looking at their performance in tests, there are certain areas where each tyre shines. The Nokian Powerproof impresses with its dry and wet braking, coming 2nd out of 50 tyres in the Autobild test. However, it has been noted for its delayed steering and reduced stability on dry roads, as well as its limited mileage and high price. Despite its weaknesses, it wins points for its good aquaplaning characteristics and convincing dynamic wet handling, and is rated 11th in the ADAC test mainly for the noise performance.
On the other hand, the Sava Intensa UHP 2, which replaced the Sava Intensa UHP, excels in areas like aquaplaning stability, and dry road handling. Other strengths include short wet and dry braking distances and good comfort, which helped it reach 6th position in the ADAC test. Particularly, its performance in fuel efficiency and mileage were highlighted in this test. The tyre's lower price is another plus, but it shares the same shortcoming with the Nokian Powerproof in terms of limited mileage. It ranks further back in the Autobild test, coming in 28th.
Summing up, while the Nokian Powerproof might be beaten by the Sava Intensa UHP 2 in overall rating, the performance of these tyres strongly depends on specific parameters that matter the most for you. Also, keep in mind that neither model has a newer version replacing it at the moment. Find out more about them on the Nokian and Sava's manufacturer page.
Although both tyres have their strengths and weaknesses, it's evident that the Sava model is more versatile overall and comes with a more competitive price, while the Nokian tyre shines when it comes to braking, making it an excellent choice for drivers prioritizing safety.
1. Nokian Powerproof Upper-middle2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Lowcost
1. Nokian Powerproof 7.452. Sava Intensa UHP 2 11.31
1. Nokian Powerproof Exemplary2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Satisfactory
1. Nokian Powerproof Conditionally recommended2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Still recommended
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | příkladné | 1 | 2+ | 1+ | |||
Nokian Powerproof Rating: Conditionally recommended | podmíněně doporučeno | 1- | 2 | 3- | |||
Sava Intensa UHP 2 Rating: Good | dobré | 2 | 2 | 2- | |||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
Nokian Powerproof | 35,7 | 28,9 | |||||
Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 36,3 | 29,8 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
Nokian Powerproof | 32,9 | 29,1 | |||||
Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 34,7 | 35,5 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | dobré | 1,7 | 1,3 | 2,8 | 2,0 | 1,6 | |
Nokian Powerproof Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,4 | 2,4 | 2,8 | 3,0 | 2,0 | |
Sava Intensa UHP 2 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,7 | 1,8 | 3,1 | 2,0 | 1,6 | |
Show test details |