Segment
1. Nokian Powerproof Upper-middle2. Nokian zLine SUV Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian Powerproof vs. Nokian zLine SUV
Both of the tyres in this comparison are made by Nokian, which is a brand from Finland. In this particular case, the Nokian Powerproof has a better rating of 71% compared to 32% of the Nokian zLine SUV. The first tyre test of Nokian Powerproof was done in 2019, compared to 2016 when was the Nokian zLine SUV first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian Powerproof dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Nokian zLine SUV also have A wet ratings. We also know where Powerproof is made - Finland.
| # | Nokian Powerproof | Nokian zLine SUV | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 | | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R20 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Nokian Powerproof 7.45
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian Powerproof Exemplary2. Nokian zLine SUV Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian zLine SUV Satisfactory2. Nokian Powerproof Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Wet circle cornering
Wet side guide
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Dry lane changing
Offroad
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Nokian Powerproof 72 dB2. Nokian zLine SUV ? dB