Segment
1. Nokian Powerproof Upper-middle2. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian Powerproof vs. Kumho Ecsta PS91
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (66%) than Kumho (60%). In this particular case, the Nokian Powerproof has a better rating of 51% compared to 21% of the Kumho Ecsta PS91. The first tyre test of Nokian Powerproof was done in 2019, compared to 2015 when was the Kumho Ecsta PS91 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian Powerproof has A wet grip rating, whereas 97% of Kumho Ecsta PS91 has B rating. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Powerproof is made in Finland and Ecsta PS91 is made in Korea.
| # | Nokian Powerproof
| Kumho Ecsta PS91
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R20 | R18 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Nokian Powerproof 7.45
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian Powerproof Exemplary2. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian Powerproof Conditionally recommended2. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Conditionally recommended
