Segment
1. Nokian Powerproof Upper-middle2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian Powerproof vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone). Generally, Firestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Nokian (66%). In this particular case, the Firestone Roadhawk 2 has a better rating of 74% compared to 54% of the Nokian Powerproof. The first tyre test of Nokian Powerproof was done in 2019, compared to 2024 when was the Firestone Roadhawk 2 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian Powerproof dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (96%) of the Firestone Roadhawk 2 also have A wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Powerproof is made in Finland and Roadhawk 2 is made in Italy.
| # | Nokian Powerproof
| Firestone Roadhawk 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R20 | R17 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Nokian Powerproof 7.45
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian Powerproof Exemplary2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Satisfactory2. Nokian Powerproof Conditionally recommended
