Segment
1. Nokian Powerproof Upper-middle2. Debica Presto UHP 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Nokian Powerproof vs. Debica Presto UHP 2
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica). Generally, Debica summer tyres are slightly better rated (67%) than Nokian (66%). In this particular case, the Debica Presto UHP 2 has a better rating of 71% compared to 51% of the Nokian Powerproof. The first tyre test of Nokian Powerproof was done in 2019, compared to 2024 when was the Debica Presto UHP 2 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian Powerproof dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (76%) of the Debica Presto UHP 2 also have A wet ratings. We also know where Powerproof is made - Finland.
| # | Nokian Powerproof
| Debica Presto UHP 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R20 | R17 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Nokian Powerproof 7.45
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian Powerproof Exemplary2. Debica Presto UHP 2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Debica Presto UHP 2 Satisfactory2. Nokian Powerproof Conditionally recommended