• 14 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Nokian Powerproof vs. BFGoodrich Advantage

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (66%) than BFGoodrich (50%). In this particular case, the BFGoodrich Advantage has a better rating of 68% compared to 51% of the Nokian Powerproof. The first tyre test of Nokian Powerproof was done in 2019, compared to 2021 when was the BFGoodrich Advantage first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the Powerproof and the Advantage were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian Powerproof dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the BFGoodrich Advantage also have A wet ratings. We also know where Powerproof is made - Finland.

# Nokian Powerproof
/51%
BFGoodrich Advantage
/68%

Add to comparison

Nokian
BFGoodrich
DimensionsR17 - R20 R14 - R20
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autobild
Name RatingWetDryRunning costs
Best values in testpříkladné12+1+
Nokian Powerproof
Rating: Conditionally recommended
podmíněně doporučeno1-23-
BFGoodrich Advantage
Rating: Good
dobré2-2+ 2-
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test35,727,5
Nokian Powerproof35,7 28,9
BFGoodrich Advantage36,331
Show test details