Segment
1. Nokian Powerproof Upper-middle2. BFGoodrich Advantage Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (66%) than BFGoodrich (50%). In this particular case, the BFGoodrich Advantage has a better rating of 68% compared to 51% of the Nokian Powerproof. The first tyre test of Nokian Powerproof was done in 2019, compared to 2021 when was the BFGoodrich Advantage first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the Powerproof and the Advantage were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian Powerproof dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the BFGoodrich Advantage also have A wet ratings. We also know where Powerproof is made - Finland.
# | Nokian Powerproof
| BFGoodrich Advantage
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R17 - R20 | R14 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Nokian Powerproof Upper-middle2. BFGoodrich Advantage Upper-middle
1. Nokian Powerproof 7.452. BFGoodrich Advantage 12.75
1. Nokian Powerproof Exemplary
1. Nokian Powerproof Conditionally recommended2. BFGoodrich Advantage Sufficient
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | příkladné | 1 | 2+ | 1+ | |||
Nokian Powerproof Rating: Conditionally recommended | podmíněně doporučeno | 1- | 2 | 3- | |||
BFGoodrich Advantage Rating: Good | dobré | 2- | 2+ | 2- | |||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
Nokian Powerproof | 35,7 | 28,9 | |||||
BFGoodrich Advantage | 36,3 | 31 | |||||
Show test details |