Segment
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV Premium2. Nokian Powerproof SUV Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (79%) than Nokian (66%). Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 255/55 R18 test, where both the Powerproof SUV and the Pilot Sport 4 SUV were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian Powerproof SUV dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (95%) of the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV also have A wet ratings.
# | Nokian Powerproof SUV
| Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R17 - R21 | R17 - R23 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV Premium2. Nokian Powerproof SUV Upper-middle
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV Exemplary2. Nokian Powerproof SUV Satisfactory
1. Nokian Powerproof SUV Satisfactory
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Offroad | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | příkladné | 1- | 2+ | 1- | |||
Nokian Powerproof SUV Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2- | 2 | 2- | |||
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV Rating: Exemplary | příkladné | 1- | 2+ | 1- | |||
Show test details |