Segment
1. Nokian Powerproof SUV Upper-middle2. Kumho Crugen HP91 Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian Powerproof SUV vs. Kumho Crugen HP91
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (66%) than Kumho (60%). But when it comes to comparing Nokian Powerproof SUV and Kumho Crugen HP91, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Nokian Powerproof SUV was done in 2020, compared to 2017 when was the Kumho Crugen HP91 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian Powerproof SUV has A wet grip rating, whereas 66% of Kumho Crugen HP91 has B rating.
| # | Nokian Powerproof SUV
| Kumho Crugen HP91
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R21 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho Crugen HP91 Satisfactory2. Nokian Powerproof SUV Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Crugen HP91 Satisfactory2. Nokian Powerproof SUV Satisfactory
