Segment
2. Nokian Powerproof SUV Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian Powerproof SUV vs. Continental SportContact 5 SUV
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (78%) than Nokian (66%). But when it comes to comparing Nokian Powerproof SUV and Continental SportContact 5 SUV, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Nokian Powerproof SUV was done in 2020, compared to 2016 when was the Continental SportContact 5 SUV first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian Powerproof SUV dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (67%) of the Continental SportContact 5 SUV also have A wet ratings.
| # | Nokian Powerproof SUV
| Continental SportContact 5 SUV
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R21 | R18 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV Exemplary2. Nokian Powerproof SUV Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian Powerproof SUV Satisfactory
