Segment
1. Nokian Line Upper-middle2. Nokian WetProof Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian Line vs. Nokian WetProof
Both of the tyres in this comparison are made by Nokian, which is a brand from Finland. The first tyre test of Nokian Line was done in 2016, compared to 2019 when was the Nokian WetProof first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian Line dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Nokian WetProof also have A wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Line is made in Finland and WetProof is made in Finland.
| # | Nokian Line
| Nokian WetProof
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 | | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
1. Nokian Line 17.
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WetProof 5.642. Nokian Line 12.17
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WetProof Highly recommended2. Nokian Line Good
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian Line Good2. Nokian WetProof Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
2. Nokian Line 72%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
1. Nokian Line 84%
Wet handling
2. Nokian Line 80%
Wet braking
1. Nokian Line 84%
Wet circle cornering
2. Nokian Line 87%
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
1. Nokian Line 83%
Dry lane changing
1. Nokian Line 85%
Dry braking
2. Nokian Line 80%
Dry steering response
2. Nokian Line 60%
Dry driving behavior
1. Nokian Line 74%
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
1. Nokian Line 63%
Rolling resistance
1. Nokian Line 78%
Price/value
2. Nokian Line 30%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
2. Nokian Line 72%
Comfort
1. Nokian Line 60%
Interior noise
2. Nokian Line 66%
