Segment
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 Premium2. Nokian Line Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian Line vs. Michelin Pilot Sport 4
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (79%) than Nokian (66%). The first tyre test of Nokian Line was done in 2016, compared to 2017 when was the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian Line dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (86%) of the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 also have A wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Line is made in Finland and Pilot Sport 4 is made in Spain/Germany.
| # | Nokian Line
| Michelin Pilot Sport 4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R16 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
2. Nokian Line 17.
Average position in tests
2. Nokian Line 12.17
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 Highly recommended2. Nokian Line Good
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian Line Good
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
2. Nokian Line 80%
Aquaplaning - cross
2. Nokian Line 72%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
2. Nokian Line 84%
Wet braking
2. Nokian Line 84%
Wet circle cornering
1. Nokian Line 87%
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
2. Nokian Line 83%
Dry lane changing
2. Nokian Line 85%
Dry braking
2. Nokian Line 80%
Dry steering response
2. Nokian Line 60%
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
2. Nokian Line 63%
Rolling resistance
1. Nokian Line 78%
Price/value
2. Nokian Line 30%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
2. Nokian Line 72%
Comfort
2. Nokian Line 60%
