Segment
1. Nokian Line Upper-middle2. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 Lowcost
Comparison: Nokian Line vs. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Laufenn). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (66%) than Laufenn (58%). But when it comes to comparing Nokian Line and Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Nokian Line was done in 2016, compared to 2021 when was the Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian Line has A wet grip rating, whereas 97% of Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 has B rating. We also know where Line is made - Finland.
| # | Nokian Line
| Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R15 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
1. Nokian Line 17.
Average position in tests
1. Nokian Line 12.17
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian Line Good2. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian Line Good2. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
1. Nokian Line 72%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
1. Nokian Line 84%
Wet handling
1. Nokian Line 80%
Wet braking
1. Nokian Line 84%
Wet circle cornering
1. Nokian Line 87%
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
2. Nokian Line 83%
Dry braking
2. Nokian Line 80%
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
2. Nokian Line 63%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
2. Nokian Line 72%
